Allowed
Vithabhai Gajanan Koli and Another v. M/S. Mafatlal Fine Spg. Mft. Co. Ltd. and Ors.
Bombay HCNMS/1240/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1240 OF 2007 IN
SUIT NO. 5445 OF 1998
Manek G. Koli & Anr. ... Plaintiffs.
V/s. M/s. Mafatlal Fine Spg. Mft. Co. Ltd. & Ors. .... Defendants.
Mr. Induprakash i/b. C.K. Tripathi for the Plaintiffs. Mr. P. Samdani, Sr. Counsel i/b. P.K. Shroff for the Defendant.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.
12TH FEBRUARY 2009.
P.C. :
. The Notice of Motion is allowed to be withdrawn
with liberty to file a fresh Notice of Motion after the
Plaintiffs are allowed to amend the plaint.
open for the Plaintiffs to seek such interim orders, as
are permissible in law.
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court