The Notice of Motion was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant's counsel stated she was no longer appearing for the Union of India with no alternative representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 16 OF 2008
IN
APPEAL NO. 764 OF 2003
IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 316 OF 2002
Union of India. , .. Appellant.
Vs.
Mid Day Radio (North) India Ltd.,
& Anr. , .. Respondents
Ms. Anamika Malhotra for the appellant.
Mr. Madhur Baya for the respondents.
CORAM : J. N. PATEL &
SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ
DATE : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :
The learned counsel appearing for the Union of India states that
she no more represents Union of India and as on the date of filing of the
2
motion she was on the panel of Union of India her name has appeared on the Board.
prosecution.
( J. N. PATEL, J)
(SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.)
Union of India
Mid Day Radio (North) India Ltd.
J.N. PATEL
R.P. SONDURBALDOTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
