The High Court of Bombay held that since the substantive appeal was already disposed of, these appeals against an interim order were futile and were dismissed as infructuous.
Appeals against the interim order dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 440 OF 2007
WITH
APPEAL NO. 441 OF 2007
IN
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1123 OF 2006
IN
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1122 OF 2006
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 731 OF 2005
Reliance Industries Ltd., , .. Appellants.
Vs.
Reliance Natural Resources Ltd., .. Respondents
Mr. S.C. Gupta i/by Junnarkar & Associates for the appellants.
Mr. D.J. Kakalia i/by Mulla & Mulla for the respondents.
CORAM : J. N. PATEL &
SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ DATE : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2009
2
P.C. :
In view of the fact that the substantive appeal has been disposed of by this Court, these appeals preferred against the interim order passed by the learned Company Judge do not survive and stand dismissed as infructuous.
( J. N. PATEL, J)
(SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.)
Reliance Industries Ltd.
Reliance Natural Resources Ltd.
J. N. PATEL
SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
