Letters Patent Appeal filed by petitioner is disposed of as withdrawn by the High Court. Liberty was granted as prayed for.
Appeal disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty as prayed for granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 206 of 2009
Vedprakash Parashnath pandey v/s. The Secretary/President-Uttarbharti Education Society & ors.
....Appellant
....Respondents
Ms. Kumud A. Bhatia for the appellant. Mr. A.C. Singh a/w. A.D.Yadav i/b. Mr. D.R. Shah for respondents 1 & 2.
CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
DATED:- September 09, 2009.
P.C.
Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant does not press the present Appeal, however, states that the Appeal which will be filed by the Appellant against the order dated 9/4/2009 should be examined on its own merits and not on the basis of observations made in the present order and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties to which Counsel appearing for the Respondent has no objection.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
Vedprakash Parashnath Pandey
The Secretary/President-Uttarbharti Education Society & ors.
SWATANTRER KUMAR
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
