The court recalled the order dismissing an appeal for non-prosecution due to a civil application. The applicant's application was allowed, the appeal restored to its original number, and the application disposed of.
Application allowed; appeal restored to original number; civil application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2009
IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 366 OF 2008
IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2816 OF 2006 WITH LPA NO. 155 OF 2009 IN REVIEW APPLICATION NO.160 OF 2007 IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.6455 OF 2006
Savita Mukund Kelkar. .. Applicant. Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Shri A.M. Joshi for the Applicant. Shri M.S. Topkar for Respondent No.1. Shri R.M. Patne, AGP for Respondent No.2. Shri K.S. Bapat i/by Shri Avinash Fatangre for Respondent No.3. Shri V.J. Bolinjkar for Respondent N.4.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2009
P.C.
This is an application for recalling of the order dated 9th January, 2009 by which an appeal filed by the Applicant was dismissed for non prosecution. We have perused the order. There is no objection to grant of the said application. We accordingly allow
2
the Civil Application in terms of prayer clause (b) and the Letters Patent Appeal is restored to its original number. Civil Application stands disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J
Savita Mukund Kelkar
State of Maharashtra
Swatantar Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
