The Commissioner of Income TAX-22, Navi Mumbai. v. M/S. Laxman D. Senghani, Mumbai.
Case brief
What is this about?
THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
| IN | THE | HIGH | COU | RT OF |
JUDICA | TURE | AT | BOMBAY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORDINA | RY | ORIG | INAL | CIVIL | JU | RISDICTION | |||
| INCOM | E |
TAX | APPEAL | NO |
.1402 | OF | 2008 |
||
| The Com | mission | er of Income | Tax-22. Vs. |
..Appell | ant. | ||||
| Shri. Lax | man D. | Senghani. | ..Respon | dent. | |||||
| Mr. | R.Ash | okan | fo | r | the | Appellant. | |||
| None | for | the | Respondent. | ||||||
| CORAM DATE |
: | F.I. | REBELLO : |
& 23rd |
R.S. Ja |
MOH nuary, |
ITE, JJ. 2009. |
||
| PC | : | ||||||||
| 1. | Considerin | g that |
the |
learned |
Tribunal | on |
the |
facts | |
| of | the | case | thought | it | fit to |
remand | the | matter | to give |
| an | opp | ortunity | to | the | assessee | leaving | all | questions |
open, in our opinion, the question of law as framed
wound not arise. Consequently appeal dismissed.
for the Assessing Officer to pass an appropriate order.
( R.S. MOHITE, J.)
( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Commissioner of Income-Tax-22
Shri. Laxman D. Senghani
F.I. Rebello
R.S. Mohite
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court