Smt. Rashmi Shrikant. v. the C.W. T.
Bombay HCWTR/1/1997
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
(-1-)
¶2
MGN
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶4
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶5
WEALTH TAX REFERENCE NO.1 OF 1997
¶6
Smt.Rashmi Shrikant............Applicant
¶7
Vs.
¶8
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax....Respondent
¶9
Mr.A.K.Jasani i/b. Mr. S.J. Mehta for the
Applicant
¶10
Mr. P.S.Sahadevan, for the Respondent
¶11
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 22nd January, 2009
P.C.:
¶12
. On instruction learned Counsel seeks to
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Rashmi Shrikant
- respondent
Commissioner of Wealth Tax
Coram
AI extract
F.I. Rebello
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
the commissioner of income-tax-8,mum Vs m/s chunilal and co.(tm) p.ltd
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 2, Mumbai Vs M/S Tractor Engineers Ltd., Mumbai
Dorr-Oliver(India) Ltd., C/O. Sharp and Tannon, Chartered Accountants, Bank of Baroda Building, Bom Vs the Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City Ii, Bombay.
C.W.T. City-I Bombay Vs Sri Dharmendra Deol