Shekhar Sumanth Dadarkar v. Pravinchandra Shantaram Tamhane and 2 Others
Bombay HCWP/2548/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
, null
What did the court decide?
, null
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶2
WRIT PETITION NO.2548 OF 2008
¶3
S.D. Construction ....Petitioner
V/s.
¶4
Pravinchandra S. Tahmane & Anr. ....Respondents
¶5
Mr.Vishal Ghosalkar for the Petitioner.
Mr.Vijay B. Mahadik for Respondent No.1.
¶6
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
DATED : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009.
¶7
P.C. :
¶8
1. Rule. By consent the rule is made returnable
forthwith and heard finally.
¶9
2. Mr.Ghosalkar, the learned counsel appearing
¶10
on behalf of the Petitioner makes a statement that the
Petitioner will grant inspection to Respondent No.1
and his Architect for the purpose of taking
measurement of flat Nos.304 on the third floor, 702,
703 and 704 on the seventh floor upon receipt of forty
eight hours notice in writing for the same. The above
statement is accepted.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
S.D. Construction
- respondent
Pravinchandra S. Tahmane
Coram
AI extract
S.J. VAZIFDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Deepak Kumar Shah ---Applicant./Intervener Vs the Official Liquidator, of Amrut Indus. Ltd.(in Liqn.)
Sandeep Promod Shah and Anr. Vs the Official Liquidation of Mafatlal Engineering Industries (in Liqn.)
Sanjeev Precision Components Pvt. Ltd. Vs ------------------------------------------
Bandra Arunodaya Co-Op Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. and Shastri Nagar Rahiwasi S.R.A.