A single judge granted a Chamber Summons in a testamentary suit application as prayed by the plaintiffs, within the framework of procedural time limits.
Chamber Summons allowed on specified prayer clauses; Plaintiffs to take steps by 8th September, 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 87 OF 2009 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 31 OF 1995 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 112 OF 1995
Smt. Lakshmi B. Bandarkar & Ors.
...Plaintiffs.
Vs.
B.S. Bandarkar & Anr. ...Defendants.
Ms. Rohini Jadhav i/by Mr.D.J. Chavan for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants.
CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 11TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C.-
1 Considering the averments made and in the interest of justice, I am inclined to grant this Chamber Summons in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). The Plaintiffs to take steps accordingly on or before 8th September, 2009.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Smt. Lakshmi B. Bandarkar & Ors.
B.S. Bandarkar & Anr.
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
