Dismissed
Mitesh S. Parekh v. Blb Ltd. and Anr.
Bombay HCARBP/344/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This arbitration petition was dismissed in default as the petitioner failed to appear despite the matter being listed thrice.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 344 OF 2009
¶4
| Mitesh Shailen Parekh vs M/s. BLB Limited and Anr. |
.... Peti .... Re |
tioner spondents |
|---|---|---|
| .... None for the Petitioner. Mr. Dilip G. Bagwe for respondent no.1. .... CORAM: ANOOP V. MO |
HTA, J. | |
| DATE : 10thAugust, | 2009 | |
| P.C.: | ||
| 1 Matter is listed thrice since 29thJune 2009. |
None | for the |
| petitioner again. | ||
| 3. Petition is dismissed in default. |
||
| (ANOOP V. | MOHTA, | J.) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mitesh Shailen Parekh
- respondent
M/s. BLB Limited
Coram
AI extract
Anoop V. Mohta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court