Disposed
Prasad T. Tendolkar v. Seema Rebendra Datta Nee Seema Parab
Bombay HCCST/3/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 3 OF 2009 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 696 OF 2008
Prasad T. Tendolkar.
... Petitioner.
V/s.
Seema Rebendra Datta Nee Seema Parab. ... Applicant (Caveator)
Mr. A.G. Damle i/b. S.S. Gawde for the Petitioner. Ms. Deepa Rahi i/b. Mayur Narendra for the Caveator.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.
06TH FEBRUARY 2009.
P.C. :
. Heard learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant/Caveator and Mr. Damle, learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner. Perused the affidavit in support. There is no affidavit in reply.
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
Prasad T. Tendolkar
Seema Rebendra Datta Nee Seema Parab
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court