The Bombay High Court allowed a chamber summons appointing a commissioner to record the evidence of an attesting witness by consent, bearing the cost to the plaintiff.
Appointment of Commissioner within eight weeks; costs to be borne by plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 104 OF 2OO9
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 15 OF 2003
IN
SUIT NO. 64 OF 2003
Adi alias Ardesir Dinshaw Irani
vs.
Shernaz P. Poonekar & Anr.
...Plaintiff
...Defendants
Mr.K.H. Mody i/b. M/s.Auroma Law for the Plaintiff.
Mr.Avinash Joshi i/b. M/s.Mulla & Mulla & Craigie
Blunt & Caroe for the Defendants.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : OCTOBER 8, 2009
P.C. :-
1Chamber Summons No.104/2009 is allowed by
consent. By consent, Mr.Dinesh Jadhav is appointed
as Commissioner to record the evidence of the
attesting witness - Dr.Piloo N. Sahiar. The
Commissioner to record the evidence within eight
2
weeks from today. Cost of the Commissioner to be
borne by the plaintiff as far as this Commissioner
is concerned.
2 Chamber Summons is disposed of(V.M. KANADE, J.)
Shernaz P. Poonekar
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court