The High Court of Bombay recorded consent terms filed by the plaintiff and defendants. The court passed a decree in terms of the settlement, disposed of the suit, and discharged the appointed commissioner for evidence.
Decree passed in terms of Consent Terms; Suit disposed of; Connected Notice of Motion disposed of; Commissioner discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 247 OF 2005
Bombay Gas Co.Ltd.
...Plaintiff
vs.
Ashok Kumar Jalan & Ors....Defendants
Mr.Nitin Thakkar, Sr.Counsel i/b. M/s.IC Legal for
the Plaintiff.
Mr.N.C. Patel i/b. Mr.A.S. Dayal & Associates for
the Defendants.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : OCTOBER 8, 2009
P.C. :-
1Parties have settled the dispute. They have
filed Consent Terms which are taken on record and
marked �X� for the purpose of identification. The
representative of the plaintiff and defendants no.1
to 3 are present in the Court. Consent Terms are
signed by the representative of the plaintiff and by
the defendants and their respective Counsel.
Undertaking given by the defendants in the Consent
2
Terms is accepted. Decree, accordingly, is passed in
terms of Consent Terms. Suit, accordingly, is
disposed of. The plaintiff is entitled for refund of
court fees as per Rules. In view of the disposal of
the suit, connected Notice of Motion does not
survive and is disposed of, accordingly. The
Commissioner appointed for recording the evidence is
discharged.
2Court Receiver to act on the authenticated
copy of this order.
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court