A receivers court directed the Plaintiff to deposit Rs. 2,72,754/- towards architect charges within two weeks, subject to their pending rights, and granted ancillary costs.
Directs Plaintiff to deposit Rs. 2,72,754/- with Court Receiver within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO. 106 OF 2009 IN
SUIT NO. 3190 OF 2006
Suresh Lachhmandas Raheja ....Plaintiff Versus Gopal Lachhmandas Raheja & Ors. ....Defendants
....Defendants
Shri K. L. Vyas, Court Receiver present. Shri Bharat Zaveri i/b. M/s. Kanga & Co. for the Plaintiff. None for Defendant No.1. Shri Amey A. Nabar i/b. M/s. Hariani & Co., Advocate for Defendant Nos. 2 & 4.
Shri Vivek Vashi a/w. Shri Shaikh Patel i/b. M/s. Bharucha & Partners, Advocates for the Defendant No.3.
CORAM : P. B. MAJMUDAR & R. V. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 5th DECEMBER, 2009.
P.C.:
We have perused the Court Receiver’s Report. Directions have been sought regarding payment of Rs.2,72,754/- towards the professional charges of the Architect.
2
Sd/Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.) (P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Plaintiff should deposit architect charges as directed in Receiver's Court.
P. B. MAJMUDAR
R. V. MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
