Disposed
Arport Authority of India v. Ramniranjan Kedia Tourism Services Pvt. Ltd.
Bombay HCAPP/1184/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) NO.705 OF 2009 in CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 17 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 1027 OF 1996
Airport Authority of India
... Appellant
versus
Ramniranjan Kedia Tourism Services Pvt. Ltd. And another ...Respondents.
Mr. D.G. Dhanure, instructed by M/s. Juris Consultus, for the appellant. Mr. V.V. Khemka for respondent No.1.
Mr. Akash Acharya, instructed by Mr. S.N. Acharya for respondent No.2.
CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR &
R.V. MORE, JJ.
DATE: DECEMBER 08, 2009.
P.C.
This appeal is filed against the interlocutory order dated 18th September, 2009, passed by the learned single Judge in Chamber Summons No. 17 of 2008.
-2-
permission to the appellant to challenge the impugned order in appeal, if present appellant desires to file appeal against the decree passed by the learned single Judge. In our view, the objection of the learned counsel for the respondent is without any substance as any interlocutory order passed in the suit can always be challenged in an appeal filed against the decree in the suit. In such appeal, all available points can be taken in accordance with law.
P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's liberty to challenge an interlocutory order in a separate appeal against the final decree is permissible.
Airport Authority of India
Ramniranjan Kedia Tourism Services Pvt. Ltd.
another
P.B. MAJMUDAR
R.V. MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court