The chamber summons was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying writ petition numbered 2629 of 2007 had already been disposed of by the court.
The chamber summons numbered 66 of 2008 is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.66 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2629 OF 2007
Soleria Land Developers
Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioners
Vs.
The Superintendent of Land
Records Bombay and Ors. ..Respondents
And
Praful Enterprises ..Applicants
....
Mr.Vibhav Krishan i/b Juris Consilis for
Petitioners
Ms.Shobha Ajeet Kumar for Respondent-BMC
CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 2, 2009
P.C.
1. In view of the fact that the Writ Petition was
disposed of, this Chamber Summons does not survive
and is dismissed as infructous.
[J.N.PATEL, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Soleria Land Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Superintendent of Land Records Bombay
J.N.PATEL
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court