The High Court at Bombay held that since the underlying writ petition was disposed of, the subsequent chamber summons became infructuous and was dismissed.
Chamber Summons No.64 of 2008 is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.64 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 88 OF 1998
Transport & Dock Workers’
Union ..Petitioner
Vs.
ONGC Ltd. and Anr. ..Respondents
Ms.Firdos Moosa i/b P.L.Mahadik for Petitioner
Mr.J.P.Cama Sr.Advocate i/b Vyas & Bhalwal for
Respondent No.1
Mr.G.Hariharan with H.K.Vardhan i/b Dr.T.C.Kaushik
for Respondent Nos.2 to 4
CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 2, 2009
P.C.
1. In view of the fact that the Writ Petition was
disposed of, this Chamber Summons does not survive
and is dismissed as infructous.
[J.N.PATEL, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Transport & Dock Workers' Union
ONGC Ltd.
J.N.PATEL
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court