Chamber summons allowed in PCM in terms of prayer clause. Order dispensed shortly.
allowance of chamber summons as prayed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 52 OF 2009
IN
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.28 OF 2009
M/s. Whiz Enterprise Pvt.Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents And Jairam Masand .. Applicant
Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the petitioner.
Mr. Bharat Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for the State. Mr. V.P. Amin i/by M/s. B. Amin & Co. for the applicant. Ms. Geeta Jogalekar for the BMC.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2009
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the other non-applicant
including the petitioner submit that they have no objection if the chamber summons is allowed. Hence, the chamber summons is
allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
M/s. Whiz Enterprise Pvt.Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
Jairam Masand
Swatantar Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
