Disposed
Madhupati v. Singhania v S. Venugopalan, Wealth-Tax Officer, C.C. Xi and Ors.
Bombay HCCHSW/162/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.162 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3621 OF 1987
Madhupati V.Singhania ...Petitioner
Vs.
S.Venugopalan,
Wealth Tax Officer & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. R. Murlidhar i/b. Vigil Juris for the Petitioner
Mr. Parag Vyas for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
J.H. BHATIA, JJ.
DATED: 20th April, 2009
P.C.:
. Considering the subsequent events, Chamber
Summons made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a)
and (b).
. Writ Petition to be placed on board on 29th
June, 2009.
(J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Madhupati V. Singhania
S. Venugopalan
F.I. Rebello
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court