The Court allowed the withdrawal of a Chamber Summons, noting that fresh summons had been filed for amendment of the Memo of Appeal.
Chamber Summons allowed to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.386 OF 2009
IN
APPEAL NO.526 OF 2003
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.500 OF 2003
IN
SUIT NO.550 OF 2003
Ayushakti Ayurved Pvt. Ltd.
& Ors.
.....Appellants
vs.
Hindustan Lever Ltd......Respondent
Mr. V.R. Dhond, Sr.Counsel with Ms.Usha Chandrashekhar i/by
Bhagwati & Co. for appellants.
Mr. Sandeep Parekh i/by Craford Bayley & Co. for respondent.
CORAM : J.N. PATEL & SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.
DATED : 24th September, 2009.
PC :
1.The Chamber Summons is sought to be withdrawn as fresh
Chamber Summons have been filed for amendment of Memo of
Appeal. The Chamber Summons is allowed to be withdrawn.
(Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J.) (J.N. Patel, J.)
Ayushakti Ayurved Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Hindustan Lever Ltd
J.N. Patel
R.P. Sondurbaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court