Shadilal and Sons v. Amit Raj Akela and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1312 OF 2009
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO.1449 OF 2009
M/s.Shadilal & Sons .. Plaintiffs Versus Amit Raj Akela & Anr. .. Defendants
Mr.N.C.Dalal i/b. Dalal & Co. for plaintiffs Mr.Rahul Singh for defendant No.1.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 14h September 2009.
P.C.:
1] Mr.Dalal appearing for plaintiff states that he would move the summons for judgement seeking such reliefs as are permissible in law against the first defendant and on receipt of the said summons for judgement and the affidavit in support thereof, it would be proper to consider the pleas raised in this chamber summons. Let this chamber summons be heard along with the summons for judgement which would be served. Vakalatnama is accepted subject to defendant No.1 reserving all pleas on the issue of jurisdiction.
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)
Coram
S.C. Dharmadikari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
State Bank of India Vs Rohit Tiwari
Prerna Sanjay Vedak and 2 Ors. Vs Amol Pandharinath Vedak
Ramesh Pannalal Ranawat proprietor of M/s. Ramesh Zaveri and Co. Vs Manjunath Proprietor of M/s. Suraj Jewel Palace
Municipal Corporation for the City of Kalyan and Dombivli Vs Leo Advertising and Marketing Co.