The court allowed the withdrawal of a summary suit filed in year 2009 after the plaintiff settled the matter out of court. As a result, the suit was dismissed.
The suit was allowed to be withdrawn and subsequently dismissed as such. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY & ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1710 OF 2009
Ramesh Pannalal Ranawat, Proprietor of M/s. Ramesh Zaveri & Co.
V/s. Manjunath, Proprietor of M/s. Suraj Jewel Palace.
... Plaintiff.
... Defendant.
Mr. Prashant Thakre i/b. Suresh Jain for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.
DATED : 11th SEPTEMBER 2009.
P.C. :-
The Plaintiff's Advocate states that the Plaintiff has given instructions to withdraw the Suit, as the matter is settled out of Court. At the request of the Advocate, the Suit is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. No order as to costs. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
Ramesh Pannalal Ranawat
Manjunath
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
