M.T.N.L. v. Pratap Jayvant Warde.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for condonation of delay in appointing arbitrator was disposed of upon satisfactory explanation.
What did the court decide?
Labour suit is remitted back for appointment of Arbitrator.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.127 OF 2009
IN SUIT NO.333 OF 1992
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ..Plaintiffs
Vs.
Pratap Jaywant Warde ..Defendant
Mr. Sumit D. Shukla i/b Shukla and Associates for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendant
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: 25th AUGUST, 2009
P.C. :
The Chamber Summons has been taken out for condoning the delay of 17 days in notifying the appointment of an Arbitrator, in compliance with the order dated 20th October 2007, passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court. The delay has been satisfactorily explained in the Affidavit in support. No reply has been filed. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.
- respondent
Pratap Jaywant Warde
Coram
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court