Milind Vitthal Kulkarni Vs Mrs. Shubhangi Milind Kulkarni

Learned counsel for the applicant requested that the order passed by this Court dismissing the matter for default may be recalled and he may be allowed to withdraw the original appeal as the dispute between the parties is settled. The said appeal was dismissed for not complying with the conditional order.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Family Court Appeal No. 44 of 2002 is restored to file. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant that he may be permitted to withdraw the

¶13

-2-

¶14

same in view of the settlement between the parties, Family Court Appeal No. 44 of 2002 is dismissed as withdrawn. Civil Application is also accordingly disposed of. Filing of the affidavit in Civil Application is dispensed with.

¶15

P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

¶16

R.V. MORE, J.

Milind Vitthal Kulkarni v. Mrs. Shubhangi Milind Kulkarni

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Milind Vitthal Kulkarni v. Mrs. Shubhangi Milind Kulkarni

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neelam S. Upadhyay Vs Sanjay M. Upadhyay

Pradip Madhubhai Mehta Vs Alpa Pradip Mehta

M/S. Ajwani Constructions Pvt.Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra and Othrs

Premji Savji Satra and Anr. Vs Nipum M. Gala

Khopoli Municipal Council and Anr. Vs Smt. Chanda R. Sable and Ors.

Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation Vs Ramchandra Vtthal Satre