Disposed
Engineering Labour Union v. Sainath Engineering Works
Bombay HCCAL/63/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYIN THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2009
IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITON NO.1525 OF 2008
Engineering Labour Union. .. Applicant.
vs.
Sainath Engineering Works. .. Respondent.
Mr. S.R. Nargolkar for applicant.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE: 5TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.
. Heard.
2. For the reasons stated in the civil
application, delay is condoned. Letters Patent Appeal
2
be registered and placed for admission in due course.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.)
Engineering Labour Union
Sainath Engineering Works
J.N. PATEL
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court