Disposed
Ms.Meenakshi Laxmidas Kharva v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPP/119/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 119 OF 2009
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.988 OF 2009
Ms Meenakshi Laxmidas Kharva .. Applicant.
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors ..Respondents.
None for the applicant-appellant.
Mr D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. For the State.
CORAM: A.R.JOSHI,J.
DATE : 2nd May,2009.
P.C.:-
1. None for the applicant. Heard learned A.P.P. Shri. D.P.
Adsule for the State. None appears for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
though they are served.
2.Application for condonation of delay of 9 days in filing
leave to file appeal is allowed in terms of prayer clause for the
reasons given in the application. Application for condonation of
delay is disposed of accordingly.
2
3.Application No. 988 of 2009 to come up on board after eight
weeks.
4.In the meantime, the applicant-appellant is directed to serve
the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 afresh in the application for leave to
file appeal. Service by R.P.A.D. is permitted. Applicant to file
service affidavit by the next date.
A.R.JOSHI,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for condonation of delay in filing leave to file appeal requires further substantive adjudication at this stage.
Ms Meenakshi Laxmidas Kharva
The State of Maharashtra
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court