was T.B. In that view of the matter, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that section 304-B has no application to the facts of the present case as the deceased did not die of any burns, bodily injury or otherwise than under normal circumstances which constitute one of the ingredients for attracting section 304-B. It is submitted that the death was on account of ailment and hence cannot be said to have been caused `otherwise in normal circumstances’. Perusal of the complaint reveals that the present applicant no.3 who happens to be the sister of the husband of the deceased was instrumental in settling the marriage and was in know of poor financial condition of the family of the deceased. It is seen from the complaint that all the family members including the husband, father in law, mother in law, two sisters, their husbands so also the brother of Bablu are said to have ill-treated the deceased. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that four male members of the family are already arrested and they are in judicial custody. The present applicants are women and are the mother and sisters of the husband. It is categorically averred that applicant nos. 2 and 3 both are married and are residing along with their husband at a different place in Barshi. After the marriage they have never resided with the family of their parents. Prima facie it appears to be very unlikely that the applicant nos.2 and 3 who are married sisters of the husband of the deceased would ill-treat the deceased as they were living separately. Be that as it may, I am of the clear view that the present applicants are entitled to be released in the event of their
