Court disposed of an application for expediting criminal trial noting that trial had commenced with seven witnesses examined. No substantive order was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2934 OF 2009
Rajarvind Singh Jogindersingh ........ Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ........Respondent.
Mr. Sandeep S. Dere adv. for the Applicant Mr. J.P. Yagnik APP. for the Respondent/State.
CORAM: A. P DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 14th August, 2009.
P. C.:
Rajarvind Singh Jogindersingh
The State of Maharashtra
A. P DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
