Applicants sought bail or expedited trial in a criminal matter. The High Court of Bombay held that bail is assigned to the Regular Court and found no delay in the nursing trial, thus refusing directions for expeditious hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
abs
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3119 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Court's or Judge's Orders
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders
Ms. Indrayani Koparkar, appointed for the applicants.
Ms. A.T. Jhaveri, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 20TH NOVEMBER 2009
P.C. :
through jail to expedite the trial or in the alternative to grant them bail.
it does not pertains to this Bench. If the applicants so desire, they may move before the Regular Court to whom the matters for bail are
2
assigned.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicants are entitled to bail.
Whether any direction for expeditious hearing of the nursing trial is necessary.
Applicants
State
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
