Ismt Ltd, v. M/S. Bharatia Mini Spring and Engg. Co. (P) Ltd, and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Referred applicants to files an appeal in two cheques mentioned in original notice The Court rejected application due to admission of repayment The Court rejected application due to witness's lack of authority and repayment of the amounts involved in the original notice.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.286 OF 2009 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.287 OF 2009 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008
ISMT Ltd. V/s. M/s.Bhaatia Mini Sping & Engg. Co.(P) Ltd.& Ors.
.. Applicants
.. Respondents
Mr.Niranjan Mundari i/b. M/s.India Law Alliance for the Applicants. Mr.Yashpal Thakur i/b.Paras Kuhad & Associates for Respondent No.1 and 2.
Mrs.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P.for the State.
CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J.
DATED : APRIL 23rd , 2009.
P.C.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for leave to appeal should be granted when the criminal complaint was concluded based on admission of repayment.
Whether the complainant's witness had authority to represent the company in the evidence.
If no legally enforceable liability existed, should the matter be reagitated.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
ISMT Ltd.
- respondent
M/s. Bhaatia Mini Sping & Engg. Co.(P) Ltd.
Coram
A.R. Joshi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court