Salim Ajijmulla Miya Ansari v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/2653/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In an appearance where the applicant did not press the application, the court directed the Sessions Court at Alibaug to expedite the trial, hoping to commence within six months.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶2
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2653 OF 2009
¶3
Salim Ajijmulla Miya Ansari........ Applicant versus
¶4
The State of Maharashtra ........Respondent.
¶5
Mr. Kuldeep S. patil adv. for the Applicants Mrs. P.P. Shinde APP. for the Respondent/State.
¶6
CORAM: A. P DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 31st July, 2009.
¶7
P. C.:
¶8
- The learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application, however seeks direction for expedited commencement of the trial. The charge sheet is already filed. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances, I deem it appropriate to direct the Sessions Court at Alibaug to expedite the trial. I hope and trust that the trial would commence within a period of six months from today.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Salim Ajijmulla Miya Ansari
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
AI extract
A. P Deshpande
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court