This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2004 OF 2009
Sagar Dhondiram Patil ........ Applicant versus
The State of Maharashtra ........Respondent.
Mr. Kedar J. Patil adv. for the Applicants Mr. J.P. Yagnik APP. for the Respondent/State.
CORAM: A. P DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 31st July, 2009.
P. C.:
demand of Rs.50,000/- from the parents of the deceased. The incident had occurred within seven years from the date of marriage and the death is unnatural death coupled with demand for dowry. Hence I do not think that this is a fit case for grant of bail. Application is rejected.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in a case involving dowry harassment and suicide under sections 304-B and 306 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sagar Dhondiram Patil
The State of Maharashtra
A. P Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
