Application for leave to appeal under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. against acquittal by Sessions Judge dismissed. High Court found circumstantial evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Leave to appeal is refused; application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
USJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2311 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2009
The State of Maharashtra
.. Applicant
v/s.
Shri Vitthal Chima Pawar & Ors. .. Respondents
Smt. V.R. Bhosale, APP for Applicant State None for respondents
CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y.GANOO, JJ.
Dated : 16th November, 2009.
P.C. :
filed under Section 378(3) of Cr.P.C. for seeking leave to appeal against the order of acquittal passed on 24.12.2008 by the learned
Addl. Sessions Judge at Baramati in Sessions Case No.23 of 2007.
: 2 :
: 3 :
the order of acquittal.
is rejected.
[R.Y.GANOO, J.]
[B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal under Section 378(3) of Cr.P.C. against an order of acquittal should be granted where the prosecution case on circumstantial evidence was not proved beyond reasonable doubts.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Shri Vitthal Chima Pawar & Ors.
B.H. MARLAPALLE
R.Y.GANOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
