The High Court of Bombay, in the presence of the applicant's counsel and on the respondent's default, allowed an application for condonation of delay in filing a criminal appeal against a prior order of acquittal.
The application for condonation of delay is allowed; the criminal application for leave to appeal is placed on board for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1993 OF 2009
(FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY)
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. OF 2009
(FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL)
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.OF 2009
(AGAINST THE ORDER OF ACQUITTAL)
[THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V/S.HUSEN HAMBIR SHAIKH]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of :
Coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
or directions and Registrar’s : Court’s or Judge’s orders
orders :
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.Y.S.Shinde,APP for applicant.
Respondent and advocate absent.
CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.
DATED : 27TH AUGUST, 2009.
PC :-
1. This application is for condonation of
delay of 55 days in filing the criminal
application for leave to appeal. The
application is served upon the respondent,
who is absent despite service.
2. Heard learned counsel for the
applicant.
3. Perused the application. For the
reasons stated in the application, the same
is allowed. The delay is condoned. Office
to number the criminal application for
leave to appeal and place the same on board
for admission in due course.
(Judge)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 55 days in filing the criminal application for leave to appeal should be condoned.
The State of Maharashtra
Husen Hambir Shaikh
R.P. Sondurbalda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court