In this criminal application for bail, the Bench held no grounds existed for granting bail as the earlier application was rejected with no change in circumstances.
The applicant was at liberty to file an application for furlough/parole leave which will be decided within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 85 OF 2009 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 595 OF 2005
Hamid @ Amu Harun Shaikh
... Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr. P.J. Pawar for the applicant. Mrs. P.H. Kantharia for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATE: FEBRUARY 04 , 2009
P.C.
No ground is made out for granting bail. Earlier also the bail application preferred by the applicant has been rejected. There is no change in circumstances. Therefore, the application is dismissed. However, the applicant is at liberty to file an application for furlough/parole leave. If such an application is made, the same shall be decided by the respondent within one week from the date of receipt of the same.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
Hamid @ Amu Harun Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
BILAL NAZKI
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
