Santosh Changu Karnekar v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court heard a criminal appeal challenging a conviction under Section 302 IPC and a life sentence. The applicant sought bail under Section 389 Cr.P.C. The court found no sufficient case for bail and rejected the application, while listing the appeal for final hearing.
What did the court decide?
Application for bail rejected. Appeal listed for final hearing.
What the court decided
PDP
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 697 OF 2009 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1554 OF 2004
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mrs. Sonia Miskin for the applicant. Smt. V.R. Bhosale, APP for State.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE &. SMT. ROSHAN DALVI,JJ.
July 22, 2009.
P.C.
We have heard Mrs. Miskin the learned
appointed advocate for the applicant. The applicant has filed Criminal Appeal No. 1554 of 2004 challenging the order of conviction and sentence passed against him under Section 302 of I.P.C. in Sessions Case No. 2 of 2003 and he has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment by the learned Additional
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to be released on bail by suspending the order of sentence under Section 389 of Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant
- applicant
State
Coram
B.H. Marlapalle
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court