The appeal was disposed of as infructous because the underlying suit had been withdrawn by the respondents, rendering the interlocutory order challenged in the appeal rendered fruitless.
Appeal disposed of as infructous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.455 OF 1999 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.50 OF 1997 IN SUIT NO.4594 OF 1996
Jasbir Singh Randhawa
.... Appellant
V/s.
Hindustan Composites Ltd and Anr.
..... Respondents
Mr.Anand Grover i/by Mr.Prakash Mahadik, for the appellant. Mr.Simil Purohit i/by Doijode Phatarphekar, for respondent No.1.
CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR, & R.V.MORE, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 10, 2009
P.C.
( R.V.MORE, J. )
( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)
Jasbir Singh Randhawa
Hindustan Composites Ltd
P.B.Majmudar
R.V.More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
