Dismissed
Shahazadi Jamil Ahmed Khan v. M.M. Mehta and Ors.
Bombay HCS/2257/1984
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
SUIT NO.2257 OF 1984
Shahzadi Jamil Ahmed Khan. Vs. Mulraj Mulukchand Mehta & Ors.
...Plaintiff.
...Defendants.
Mr. A.B. Nagvekar i/b. Soloman & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr.D. Chitnis for the Defendants.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
October 16, 2009 .
P.C.
Parties are present before the Court. The Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff and the Defendants have tendered Consent Terms signed by the parties and by their Advocates. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X”. In terms of the request made to the Court, and as envisaged in the Constent Terms, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
Shahzadi Jamil Ahmed Khan
Mulraj Mulukchand Mehta
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court