The suit was dismissed for want of prosecution because the plaintiffs failed to pursue it after counsel stated no instructions were forthcoming during an adjournment.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUMMARY SUIT NO.1277 OF 2003
Bharti Cellulr Ltd.
..Plaintiffs
Vs.
Dhiren Udyyshi Shah
..Defendant
Ms. Priti Dhotre i/b Mr. A. N. Makhijani for the Plaintiffs
None for the Defendant
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATE: 15TH OCTOBER, 2009
P.C. :
The Suit has been placed under the caption of dismissal under order 227 of High Court (O.S.) Rules. On 23rd September 2009, an adjournment was granted on the request of Counsel for the Plaintiffs. Counsel states that no instructions are forthcoming from the Plaintiffs for pursuing the suit. In these circumstances, the Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
