The High Court of Bombay allowed the withdrawal of the plaintiff's suit, dismissing it accordingly, upon instruction from the counsel that the claim had been settled by parties out of court.
Suit allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Refund of Court fees, as per rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 1210 OF 1984
The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay. ... Plaintiff.
V/s.
M/s. Sonawala Industries & Anr. ... Defendant.
Mr. P. Kandhar i/b. M/s. Mulla & Mulla & CBC for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Tamboli i/b. T. Dayabhai for the Defendant.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.
16TH FEBRUARY 2009.
P.C. :
Mr. Kandhar, learned Advocate appearing for the
| . | . | , | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plaintiffs | states | that |
the | suit | claim | has | been settled |
by | |
| parties | out | of Cou |
rt. | He | has, | ther | efore | , instructions |
to |
| withdraw | the | suit. | In | the | light | of | this | statement, | the |
Suit is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. No
order as to costs. Refund of Court fees, as per rules.
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
SC DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
