Petitioner withdrew the writ petition to avail an alternative remedy following a preliminary objection raised by respondents regarding alternate remedies available.
petition withdrawn and disposed of with no order as to cost
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
SPB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 864 OF 2008
Mukund Shinde, Proprietor of
New Bombay Electricals .. Petitioner.
V/s.
City & Industrial Devp. Corporation .. Respondents.
---
Mr. Vaibhav Sugdare for the petitioner.
Mr. D.A.Nalawade, GP for the Respondent no.5.
Mr. G.S.Hegde a/w. Ashutosh Kulkarni for the respondent
nos. 1 to 4.
---
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR &
A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 08TH JULY, 2008.
P.C.:
. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner
states that the petitioner craves leave to withdraw the
petition in order to enable the petitioner to take out
appropriate proceedings in the matter, as a preliminary
objection regarding availability of alternate remedy is
raised on behalf of the respondents. Petition is
accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed
of with no order as to cost.
(R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.)
-: 2 :-
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
Mukund Shinde
City & Industrial Devp. Corporation
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
A. A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court