The High Court held that the petitioner cannot claim the benefit of the Agriculture Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008, as its application to a specific institution is a matter of Central Government policy.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as misconceived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7619 OF 2008
Shri Lala Bhiva Zagade ...Petitioner.
V/s.
The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents.
Mr.M.B.Gawade , adv. for the Petitioner.
CORAM: Bilal Nazki&
J.H.Bhatia,JJ.
DATE : 20th November, 2008.
P.C.:
1. Respondent No.3 has given loan to the petitioner.
The petitioner has made representation that the Agriculture
Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008 of the Government
of India should be applied to the respondent
no.3/Institution as well. This is a matter of policy of
the Central Government and this Court can not extend to the
institution to which it is not applied.
2. Writ Petition is misconceived and is accordingly
dismissed.
(Bilal Nazki, J.)
: 2 :
(J.H.Bhatia, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Agriculture Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008 applies to respondent no.3/Institution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Lala Bhiva Zagade
The Union of India
Bilal Nazki
J.H.Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court