Petitioners sought withdrawal of the writ petition. The High Court of Bombay pending civil appellate jurisdiction dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5497 OF 2008
DIST.: PUNE
Sulabha Ramesh Dhakate & Anr. ...Petitioners
Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.
Ms. H.K. Mandlik for the Petitioners
Mr. C.R. Sonawane, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State.
CORAM : B ILAL NAZKI and
J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 19, 2008
P.C. :-
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the
petition on instructions. Dismissed as withdrawn.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
J.H. BHATIA, J.
Sulabha Ramesh Dhakate & Anr.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Bilal Nazki
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
