Vithhal Shripatrao Ladkat v. Prabhakar S. Ladkat and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Petitioner granted liberty to take appropriate proceedings in law. No substantive legal proposition established.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Petitioner granted liberty to take appropriate proceedings in law. No substantive legal proposition established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6805 OF 2008
DIST.: PUNE
Vithhal Shripatrao Ladkat ...Petitioner
Versus
Prabhakar S. Ladkat & Ors.
...Respondents.
Mr. M.S. Lagu for the Petitioner
Ms. Sana Yusuf Baugwala i/by Mr. Gorwardkar for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : B ILAL NAZKI and J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 19, 2008
P.C. :-
Mr. Lagu, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to
withdraw the petition, with liberty to take appropriate proceedings that may be available in law. Dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
J.H. BHATIA, J.
Vithhal Shripatrao Ladkat
Prabhakar S. Ladkat
BILAL NAZKI
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court