Petition rendered infructuous after respondent counsel stated government had not taken possession of disputed land. Disposed with no order as to costs.
Writ petition disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDCITION WRIT PETITION NO.6536 OF 2008
Baban Panduran Khalkar. .. Petitioner Vs. Additional Collector and Competent Authority, Nashik & Ors. .. Respondents
Shri R.D. Soni i/by M/s. Ram & Co. for the Petitioner. Shri V.S. Gokhale, AGP for State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J DATE : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008
P.C.
Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents states
that in this case, the possession of the land in dispute was not taken by the Government and the same remains with the land holders, and as such no further action can survive. In view of the statement made, the petition has been rendered infructuous. The Petition accordingly is disposed of with no order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.A. BOBDE, J
Baban Panduran Khalkar
Additional Collector and Competent Authority, Nashik
Swatanter Kumar
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
