Bhirao Shetiba Nalawade v. Mukund Shamrao Pawar
Case brief
What is this about?
Letters Patent Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel for appellants had no instructions to withdraw the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.144 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3255 OF 2008
Shri Bhimrao Shetiba Nalawade and others. ... Appellants Vs Mukund Shamrao Pawar and others ... Respondents
Mr. S.S. Patwardhan for the appellants. Mr. A.B. Borkar for the respondent No.1. Mr. S.R. Nargolkar Assistant Government Pleader for the State.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & S.A. BOBDE, J.
DATE : 14TH OCTOBER, 2008
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that he has no instructions to withdraw this Letters Patent Appeal. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.A. BOBDE, J.
Shri Bhimrao Shetiba Nalawade and others
Mukund Shamrao Pawar and others
Swatanter Kumar
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court