Disposed
Atmaram Laxman Bandekar v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/5799/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5799 OF 2008
Atmaram Laxman Bandekar ..... V/s
State of Maharashtra & Anr...
.....Petitioner
... Respondents
Mr.M.P.Vashi i/by M/s.M.V.Vashi & Associates, Adv. For petitioner.
Mr.V.S.Masurkar, AGP for the State.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J . & A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 14th AUGUST 2008.
PC:
Learned counsel for the State submits that without prejudice to their rights and contentions this writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner can very well make a representation to the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal/competent authority who would consider the same. In the event of petitioner making such a representation, the Tribunal/competent authority shall consider all the aspects in accordance with law. In view of the statement made by respondents writ petition is disposed of. Respondents to abide by the statement.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P.DESHPANDE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the petitioner can make a representation to the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal or competent authority.
Atmaram Laxman Bandekar
State of Maharashtra
S. N. SANTHWAN
A.P. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court