This order records the withdrawal of a writ petition by the petitioner. The High Court dismissed the writ petition on withdrawal and vacated any interim orders.
The writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5630 OF 2004
Rajendra Padmakar Vispute & Ors. ..... ..... Petitioners. Versus The Director, Maharashtra State Bureau of Textbook Production and Curriculum Research and Anr. ..... ..... Respondents.
..... ..... Respondents.
Mr. A. M. Joshi for the Petitioner. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP for the State.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and J. H. BHATIA, JJ.
DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions to
withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn. Any interim orders passed also stand vacated.
Sd/-
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
Sd/-
(J. H. BHATIA, J.)
Rajendra Padmakar Vispute
The Director, Maharashtra State Bureau of Textbook Production and Curriculum Research
BILAL NAZKI
J. H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
