Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. Impugned interim orders vacated. Decision dismissed.
Writ petition dismissed; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1123 OF 2005
Manohar Haribhau Tejnekar. ..... ..... Petitioner. Versus The Director and Ors. ..... ..... Respondents.
Mr. Rajeev Matkar for the Petitioner. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP for the State.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and J. H. BHATIA, JJ.
DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as
withdrawn. Any interim orders passed also stand vacated.
Sd/-
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
Sd/-
(J. H. BHATIA, J.)
Manohar Haribhau Tejnekar
The Director and Ors.
BILAL NAZKI
J. H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
