Petitioner sought leave to withdraw an infructuous writ petition after the impugned order was withdrawn. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
mgj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No. 4445 of 2008
Shri Baburaoa Daji Virkar ..Petitioner
vs.
1. The State of Maharashtra
and others ..Respondents
Shri P.A.Pol for petitioner.
Smtr.M.P.Thakur, A.G.P. for respondent no.1.
CORAM: J.N.PATEL &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
14th October, 2008
P.C.
1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits
that since the impugned order was withdrawn by
order dated 4th July, 2008, the petition has become
infructuous. The petitioner, therefore, seeks
leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (J.N.PATEL J.)
Shri Baburaoa Daji Virkar
The State of Maharashtra
J.N. Patel
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court